Return to Index Page

 

 

BRANT - ONLY

A  POLITICAL  

BOUNDARY:

 

 

The following is Copyright © 1997-2020 by Clayton Barker, all rights reserved. It was published on the editorial page of The Burford Times, in October of 1997, in Burford, Ontario, Canada.

 

 

1875 Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of Brant, Ont. By Page & Smith.

 

I wrote the following article back in 1997 to give an historical view on local government structure here in the former Township of Burford. It was written at the time when nobody knew what the new restructured Brant would consist of, and there was much talk about the "One Big Brant" theory, which would have included an amalgamation with the City of Brantford.

 

The former Township of Burford had originally consisted of about 24 communities: Burford (formerly Claremont), Bishop's Gate [Note: not known as Bishopsgate all-one-word like people call it today] Cain's Corner's, Falkland (formerly Woolverton's Mills), Etonia, Princeton, Gobles, Creditville (formerly Sheffield), Muir (formerly Trimble's Corner's), Cathcart (formerly Sydenham), Victoria (formerly Rag Town), Salem, Harley (formerly Derby), Northfield Centre (formerly Florencevale), Fairfield Plains, Scotland (also known as Malcolm's Mills), Kelvin, Ranelagh, Mt. Zion (also known as Wale's Corner's), Tansley, Woodbury (formerly Forces Corners), New Durham, Hatchley (Hatchley Station), Norwich Gore.

 

Most of these hamlets or settlements no longer have much of a main street any more. In most cases there are no store's or shops to difine what was their centre of business. However, In the beginning, they all had a church and a school, which was what brought the people together and gave them their community identities.

 

Even though the schools and churches have all been amalgamated and most of them torn down, those families who remain in these areas continue to identify themselves with the name of the hamlet that had once thrived there, which has long disappeared. Along the concession roads in the areas between each hamlet or settlement, you will also note that most of the old century farms have also disappeared. On the other hand, however, it is plain to see that there are many new single family residential homes and properties, which are on the increase. They compensate for the missing farms and therefore indicate that these rural areas are not always disappearing.

In the last few weeks there has been great confusion and uncertainty concerning the future of the County of Brant and what will be its Municipal make up / structure. I think the residents of the present Township of Burford owe their Township councillors a great deal of credit for standing firm and holding their ground on the issue of County restructuring. They have done well to not be swallowed up whole by the illusion that the "One Big Brant" theory is so great! [Note: the "One Big Brant theory included the City of Brantford]. Just look at it this way - Just be glad you have an elected Township Council who can go to bat for you and also give you the opportunity to voice your opinions!

 

Going back 146 years ago when the Township of Burford was shoved into a provisional (temporary) united County of Brant with portions of Wentworth and Halton, nobody had a choice. Before 1851, all the lands within the present County of Brant except for Burford and Oakland Townships were part of the original “Haldimand Grant" (Six Nations of the Grand River) and were associated with Ancaster and Hamilton. Burford and Oakland belonged to Oxford and were associated with Woodstock and London.

 

Forms of government, such as one-tier, two-tier, three-tier, are one thing and physical boundaries, known as geographic Townships, another. Townships have existed in Ontario for over 200 years but only as Surveyed grid systems to divvy up land into parcels of individual or group ownership. Township Government on the other hand has only been in existence in Ontario for a short period of time. Burford was originally surveyed in 1793 as a physical "Township", but it wasn't until after the passing of the Municipal Act of 1849 (abolishing single-tier Districts and allowing the formation of Township and County Councils) that Burford's Township council was formed on Jan. 21st.1850. In the years between 1792 and 1842 all the affairs of the province of Upper Canada (now Ontario) was run by the provincial government and martial law presided over the land...sound familiar? Maybe this is the direction our Provincial leaders are leading us these days, with the potential mandatory mass fingerprinting of all of the provinces' people and restructuring to reduce the number of Municipalities in the province?

 

Physical and cultural boundaries, to the upper tier government, mean nothing. To them the province is a two-dimensional map hanging on their wall and the history of the people who live there began when these individuals were elected to parliament! The key word here is "elected". We can un-elect them just the same!

 

Regardless of the political / judicial boundaries that, for one reason or another, change over the course of time; there are well established cultural boundaries within the fabric of the County of Brant and these will probably never change. Since Burford was always situated at the western edge of what was classified as "The Indian Lands" i.e. being physically segregated from the fast-growing industrial steel towns east of the reserve (at the head of Lake Ontario), Burford developed strong ties with Woodstock, which it shared a common heritage with.

 

In 1788, following the American Revolution, the province (then known as Quebec) was divided into four districts, which were very large, as the population of the then vast wilderness was very low. Each of these districts had one representative in the government, and all of the lands west of the Six Nations Reserve and between Lake Huron and Erie and east of the St. Clair river was in the District of Hesse. By 1792, the British province of Quebec was divided into Upper and Lower Canada and the four districts remained, but were further divided up into 19 counties - each county being represented at parliament by only one member. However, the three counties of Norfolk, Oxford and Middlesex were grouped together with only one representative for the group.

 

The 19 counties that were designed by parliament in 1792 were only outlines or blocks of smaller portions of the province but did not have established county councils. Also, the district of Hesse was renamed the "Western District" (which Burford belonged to). As more and more settlers came into the province, the need for better representation grew and in 1798 the province of Upper Canada underwent a 'restructuring' and an Act was passed to create 8 district governments to oversee 23 Counties with 158 Townships. Again, County governments and Township governments did not exist. Only one appointed representative looked after the people of each district at parliament. Burford of course belonged to the County of Oxford, located in the District of London (formerly the Western District).

 

I would like to point out, that the Township of Oakland was originally surveyed as part of Townsend (in Norfolk) and was known as "The Townsend Gore", but in 1800 was added to Burford and also Oxford and was known as "The Burford Gore". It wasn't until 1821 that the Burford Gore was given Township status and was renamed Oakland - but remained with Oxford. Back then, politicians shuffled District and County boundaries as they pleased and did not have to worry about the opinion of the ratepayer. It is interesting to note that also in the year 1821, the Townships of Nissouri and Zorra were added to the County of Oxford.

 

By 1825 there were 11 districts in the province and more change was on the horizon. In 1839 another Act of parliament was passed which reduced the size of the districts and the Township of Burford belonged to the District of Brock, which included: Nissouri, Zorra, Blenheim, Blandford, Norwich, Dereham, Oakland, North Oxford, West Oxford, and East Oxford.

 

In 1849, with the passing of an Act of Parliament, Known as the "Municipal Act", districts were abolished and Township and County governments were given the 'green light'. Burford Township Council was formed in 1850 and for a year it was in the Oxford County structure. Then in 1851 another Act was passed which called for the "restructuring of certain Counties for Judicial, political or other reasons," and Burford was hacked away from Oxford and shoved into a vat with portions of Halton and Wentworth. This strategic manoeuvre, all of a sudden, overlapped the so-called "Indian Lands" and soon there were no more "territorial barriers" along the road between Ancaster and London.

 

A County courthouse and Gaol was constructed in what was then the Town of Brantford and on Jan. 24th, 1853 the first meeting of the newly formed County of Brant was held and the provisionally (temporary) united Counties of Halton-Wentworth-Brant was dissolved. Now, in the year 1997, (almost 150 years later) someone is trying to force a change that will put us back to a district situation, except this time there are larger populations in the individual Townships and the city of Brantford and Town of Paris. Someone is always trying to re-invent the wheel and still others somehow find ways for history to repeat itself.

 

In the 1830's & 40's the larger districts were reduced and divided up into smaller Townships for better representation to the people as the populations increased. In the "One Big Brant" scenario, it would be the reverse; there would be one large body with a handful of representatives - not necessarily originating from your own particular geographic area, mind you. These newly elected "Aldermen" would be in charge of a larger population - possibly too large to handle.

 

"Less" is not "more" when it comes to representation. People need to know that someone who shares their home turf is up there at the Council meetings delivering first-hand, information and concerns, which require council's attention or action. Let's not see history repeat itself like it did with the rebellion of 1837 - which was caused by poor or insufficient representation.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

DISCLAIMER

The information contained on this page represents the research findings and opinions of the author. The material on this page reflects the author’s best judgement in light of the information available at the time of compilation. Any use of this material made by a third party, or reliance on, or decisions made based on it are the responsibility of such third parties. The author accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this work.      

 

REFERENCES:

My brain and everything that it has collected over the past 58 years...

 

 

-       Null -

 

CLICK

TOPICS BELOW

Disclaimer

 

About

Burford

 

 

LINKS To Check Out

 

About The Author